Case Study: How to Resolve a Cheque Bounce Dispute Legally under Section 138
Legal Solution for a Cheque Bounce Dispute under Section 138
A client reached out to a criminal lawyer seeking assistance in a cheque bounce disputes involving their relative. The relative had ordered cloth on credit but never received the goods. Despite the non-delivery, the supplier attempted to encash the cheque, which subsequently bounced. This situation led to a legal dispute, and the client needed immediate guidance on how to resolve it through the legal process.
The lawyer explained the steps needed, including filing a Vakalatnama to authorize representation, applying for anticipatory bail to avoid arrest, and ensuring that all legal requirements were met. The lawyer assured the client that affordable legal services would be provided, helping the relative navigate the case and avoid legal trouble. This case emphasizes the importance of taking quick legal solution in cheque bounce disputes.
Summary of Cheque Bounce Resolution under Section 138
The client’s relative issued a cheque to pay for cloth that was ordered but never delivered. Despite the goods not being received, the supplier attempted to encash the cheque, which subsequently bounced. This led to a legal complication. A criminal complaint for cheque bounce was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accusing the relative of committing the offense. This case highlights the importance of addressing cheque bounce issues promptly to avoid unnecessary legal troubles.
During the call, the lawyer:
- Explained the importance of having legal representation to handle the cheque bounce case properly.
- Outlined the steps needed to defend the relative, including filing a Vakalatnama (to authorise the lawyer to represent them) and applying for cheque bounce anticipatory bail to avoid arrest.
- Confirmed the amount of the cheque involved and assured the client that affordable legal fees would be provided for handling the case.
Next Steps
- The lawyer agreed to send a detailed proposal of the legal fees and an action plan for handling the case. The plan included the steps for defending the relative and addressing the cheque bounce issue.
- The client was requested to share a copy of the summons via WhatsApp, allowing the lawyer to review the documents and proceed with the next steps.
- For smooth communication throughout the process, a WhatsApp group was created, which included the lawyer, the client, and the relative involved. This would allow for quick updates, clarifications, and effective collaboration at every stage.
This case highlights how a cheque bounce situation can become more complicated when goods are not delivered as agreed. It emphasizes the importance of quick legal action and the need for clear communication to navigate such disputes smoothly.
Conclusion
This case clearly demonstrates the importance of taking quick action when dealing with cheque bounce situations, particularly when goods are not delivered as promised. Delays or inaction can lead to legal complexities and unwanted consequences. With the right legal guidance and representation in cheque bounce matters, the client can effectively resolve the dispute and protect their relative from further legal trouble. By ensuring timely intervention and following the legal process, the client can safeguard their interests and avoid potential complications in the future.
Related Blogs: